建议：添加网站，是否支持模板式添加？

The author is good, I just installed nginxui today, and this function is really powerful. I encountered some problems during use, and I have some suggestions: 1. My scenario is that nginx only does reverse proxying, and the majority of the backend websites are similar upstream (except for the name of the upstream, the content is the same, which is a block containing multiple IP addresses and IP hash parameters). All the websites are forced to use https, and the certificates are wildcard certificates. In other words, except for the server_name, everything is the same... 2. Now in nginxui, it is very troublesome to add only reverse proxy websites. For example, when I add a site, the upstream cannot be selected. In the menu bar, there is an upstream, but it cannot be edited. **If it can be edited here, that would be great.** 3. If it is only a reverse proxy site, adding it is very troublesome. The default index and root are not useful and need to be deleted, and the listen also needs to be adjusted. 4. When it comes to the third step (configuring SSL), I am completely confused about what to do. In fact, most of the operations are just configuring, applying for Let's Encrypt certificates, and this place is not optimized to change it to one-click? **I just found that there is a template on the right side when editing the website after adding, can this be put into the adding process as well?** 5. In terms of the reverse proxy function, other software that I have used is very simple, for example, the introduction page of a software directly has an add proxy service, and all you need to do is fill in the domain name, forwarding protocol, IP, and port. If the backend has multiple servers for load balancing, you can directly configure it on a separate interface and select it when adding sites. This makes batch editing easier. From the user's perspective, understanding the power of nginxui has indeed caused a lot of diversification in management, but if we can optimize some common operations (such as adding similar reverse proxying repeatedly), it would be even better.