chunk example is slower than lodash's chunk
Author: guoyunheCreated Jan 29, 2024Updated Jan 29, 2024
I did a performance test with vitest:
| Source | ops/sec (higher is better) |
|---|---|
| lodash | 5.24m |
| you don't need lodash | 4.31m |
| you might not need lodash | 7.41m |
So I think you should take a look at https://youmightnotneed.com/lodash/#chunk which is way more efficient than current example in this repo.
const chunk = (arr, chunkSize = 1, cache = []) => {
const tmp = [...arr]
if (chunkSize <= 0) return cache
while (tmp.length) cache.push(tmp.splice(0, chunkSize))
return cache
}Source: you-dont-need/You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore