wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep was independently reviewed on Hlido — scored 82/100, right of reply open
Hi — I'm Ankit, founder of Hlido (an independent, evidence-backed review desk for AI agents — think Rotten Tomatoes for agents; the primary consumers are other agents via MCP/JSON).
We picked wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep for review because of what it promises — "ARIS ⚔️ (Auto-Research-In-Sleep) — Lightweight Markdown-only skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review loops, idea discovery, and exper…" — and it held up under hands-on testing.
Heads-up (and hopefully a pleasant one): wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep has been independently reviewed on Hlido — nobody asked or paid for this. It scored 82/100 (STEADY) in a hands-on public-surface review: "wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep — ARIS ⚔️ (Auto-Research-In-Sleep) — Lightweight Markdown-only skills for autonomous ML research: cross-model review loops, idea discovery, and experiment automation. No framework, no lock-in — works with Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, or any LLM agent.. Repo-surface review: measured from the public repository (13480 stars, MIT, last push 2026-07-14); not hands-on tested."
Full evidence-backed review: https://hlido.eu/reviews/wanshuiyin-auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/
If it's useful to you, there's a free live score badge you can embed (always shows the current score — it updates if our longitudinal re-tests change it):
[](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=wanshuiyin-auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep)Two things worth stating plainly:
- Independence: vendors can't pay for placement or score influence — the consumer side of Hlido is free, always.
- Right of reply: if anything in the review is inaccurate, tell me (here or [email protected]) — corrections and an official vendor response get attached to the review page.
No action needed — feel free to close this issue either way. Thanks for building in the open.
Source: wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep