How to understand the relationship between mamba2 and GLA?

Hi, author, thank you for sharing your fantastic work.

When I was reading things about mamba, I found that in mamba-mini , it says that GLA is a special case of mamba and when the dimension of w changed from [batch, seqlen, dtstate, dim] to [batch, seqlen, dtstate], then they are equalivent.

The author of VMamba also suggested that in the arxiv paper:

Then I found that in the SSD, which is the core component of mamba2, the dimension of matrix A $\odot$ dt is also reduced to [..., nheads], which is may suggests that the matrix w has been reduced to [batch, seqlen]. So my question is, is mamba2 a special case of GLA?

Moreover, I did an experiment testing mamba2 and GLA, and found that they almost share the same result with each other, only with numerical differences (1e-5).

So, How to understand the relationship between mamba1, mamba2 and GLA?