Dependency parsing: is there some way to discourage multiple `nsubj` dependents?
Author: nschneidCreated Jan 30, 2024Updated Jul 15, 2026
Labelsenhancementquestionfixed
A very weird English tree produced by Stanza 1.6.0 in the demo:
My cousin my extremely rude colleague admired last year chewed the chicken enthusiastically.
In UD, no word is allowed to have multiple (plain) nsubj dependents. But "admired" has two.
Is there a recommended alternate training or decoding method in Stanza that could avoid this sort of problem?
Source: stanfordnlp/stanza