[GLD Serializer Benchmark] JavaScript simdjson-parse+JSON.stringify 0.9.2 — spec compliance misses
Hi — this is a friendly report from the GLD Serializer Benchmark, an independent multi-language suite that times serializers and checks them against the published format specs (RFC 8259, YAML 1.2, …).
We measured simdjson-parse+JSON.stringify 0.9.2 on JavaScript. The suite recorded spec-profile misses for this pin. The catalog is report-only: a miss is not a CI failure, and some cases are older or stricter profiles (for example RFC 4627 vs RFC 8259) rather than a crash.
Compliance results (please start here)
This link opens the live heatmap on JavaScript with simdjson-parse+JSON.stringify already selected (All standards). Click a scored cell for each FAIL and the cited spec paragraph:
How the catalog is built, and how to read a FAIL line:
- https://leo-gan.github.io/GLD.SerializerBenchmark/compliance/
- https://leo-gan.github.io/GLD.SerializerBenchmark/compliance/reading-results/
I am not pasting the case list here so you can use the Dashboard (filters, heatmap, and spec links) rather than a static dump.
Optional: one standard family only — #compliance/javascript/simdjson-parse%2BJSON.stringify/json (or yaml, cbor, …).
Benchmark timings (same pin)
The same suite also publishes encode / decode time and payload size for this library on JavaScript:
Details table (this library pre-selected):
That page is the live L1 snapshot, not a claim that one library is “best.”
Ask
Please look at the Compliance view for simdjson-parse+JSON.stringify. If a miss is a real decoder/encoder bug you want to fix, great. If it is an intentional default (accepting NaN, YAML 1.1 bools, …), a short note here is enough — we will keep the catalog as-is unless the library’s documented contract changes.
Thanks for the library.
Source: simdjson/simdjson