pg_ssl_cert / pg_ssl_cert_key are documented but silently ignored in Kong Gateway OSS

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Kong version ($ kong version)

3.9.3 (and master as of today)

Current Behavior

pg_ssl_cert and pg_ssl_cert_key are documented as standard, non-Enterprise Kong Gateway configuration options:

pg_ssl_cert — The absolute path to the PEM encoded client TLS certificate for the PostgreSQL connection. Mutual TLS authentication against PostgreSQL is only enabled if this value is set.

pg_ssl_cert_key — If pg_ssl_cert is set, the absolute path to the PEM encoded client TLS private key for the PostgreSQL connection.

— https://developer.konghq.com/gateway/configuration/

In Kong Gateway OSS these properties do not exist and are silently ignored:

1. They are not declared in kong/conf_loader/constants.lua — only pg_ssl, pg_ssl_verify, pg_ro_ssl and pg_ro_ssl_verify are.
2. They are not documented in kong.conf.default.
3. kong/db/strategies/postgres/connector.lua never passes a client certificate to pgmoon. Both the read-write config in _M.new() and the ro_override table set only ssl, ssl_verify and cafile.

Because unknown KONG_* / kong.conf keys are dropped rather than rejected, an operator who follows the documentation gets no warning at all — the connection is simply made without a client certificate, and PostgreSQL rejects it:

[PostgreSQL error] failed to retrieve PostgreSQL server_version_num:
receive_message: failed to get type: tlsv13 alert certificate required

This was reported in #11768. That issue was closed with the pending author feedback label seven days after it was filed, so I don't believe the underlying gap was ever addressed — it's still reproducible on master. A maintainer noted there that mTLS to PostgreSQL is expected to require Kong Gateway Enterprise, which is what I'd like to clarify (see below).

Expected Behavior

Either:

(a) pg_ssl_cert / pg_ssl_cert_key work in OSS as documented, or

(b) if mTLS to PostgreSQL is intentionally Enterprise-only, the OSS configuration reference is updated to say so, and Kong fails to start (or logs a warning) when these keys are set but unsupported — rather than silently ignoring a security-relevant setting.

Steps To Reproduce

1. Configure PostgreSQL with ssl = on and clientcert = verify-full in pg_hba.conf.
2. Configure Kong OSS:
   复制

   database        = postgres
   pg_ssl          = on
   pg_ssl_verify   = on
   pg_ssl_cert     = /path/to/client.pem
   pg_ssl_cert_key = /path/to/client.key
   lua_ssl_trusted_certificate = /path/to/ca.pem

3. Run kong migrations bootstrap -vv.
4. Observe the tlsv13 alert certificate required failure, and note that pg_ssl_cert / pg_ssl_cert_key never appear in the -vv config dump.

Anything else?

The driver already supports this. Kong depends on kong-pgmoon == 1.16.2 (kong-latest.rockspec), and the Kong/pgmoon fork already implements client certificates for the OpenResty cosocket path. send_ssl_message does:

local luasec_opts = self.config.luasec_opts or self:create_luasec_opts()
if self.sock.setclientcert then
  local ok, err_internal = self.sock:setclientcert(luasec_opts.certificate, luasec_opts.key)
  ...
  return self.sock:sslhandshake(false, nil, self.config.ssl_verify)
else
  if self.sock.tlshandshake then
    return self.sock:tlshandshake({
      verify          = self.config.ssl_verify,
      client_cert     = luasec_opts.certificate,
      client_priv_key = luasec_opts.key,
    })
  ...

and create_luasec_opts reads and parses the PEM files directly from config.cert / config.key:

if self.sock_type == "nginx" and key and cert then
  key  = assert(ssl.parse_pem_priv_key(pl_file.read(key, true)))
  cert = assert(ssl.parse_pem_cert(pl_file.read(cert, true)))
end

So enabling this in OSS looks like plumbing two values through, with no driver, OpenSSL, or protocol work required:

1. Declare pg_ssl_cert, pg_ssl_cert_key, pg_ro_ssl_cert, pg_ro_ssl_cert_key in kong/conf_loader/constants.lua and document them in kong.conf.default.
2. Validate in kong/conf_loader/init.lua that the pair is set together and that both files are readable.
3. Pass cert / key into the pgmoon config in connector.lua, in both _M.new() and ro_override.
4. Unit tests in spec/01-unit/03-conf_loader_spec.lua plus a changelog/unreleased/kong/ entry.

My question before I open a PR: would a patch along these lines be accepted into Kong Gateway OSS? I'm happy to write it, including tests and changelog, and to mirror it for the read-only connection for consistency with the existing pg_ssl / pg_ro_ssl pairs. But given the earlier comment on #11768 that this is an Enterprise capability, I'd rather confirm the direction than send a PR that conflicts with product intent. If the answer is that it stays Enterprise-only, I'd be glad to file the documentation correction instead.