Docker + persistent context reports `tampering: true` on Fingerprint Pro Playground
Summary
I tested CloakBrowser in Docker with a persistent Playwright context, Windows/Office fonts, Xvfb, and a residential proxy. Fingerprint Pro Playground consistently reports the browser as not detected for bot and incognito signals, but reports browser tampering on every seed.
Environment
- CloakBrowser:
0.5.10 - Node.js:
22-bookworm-slim - Playwright Core:
1.60.0 - Docker Engine:
29.1.3 - Release channel:
preview - Launch API:
launchPersistentContext - Headless mode:
falseunderxvfb-run - Cloak options:
geoip: true,humanize: true,humanPreset: "careful" - Fingerprint options:
--fingerprint=<seed>and--fingerprint-noise=false - Noise override: enabled with
--fingerprint-noise=false - Fonts: 230 Windows/Office font files mounted at
/root/.local/share/fonts/windows - Target:
https://demo.fingerprint.com/playground - Proxy: residential proxy, credentials omitted
The supplied Cloak license was validated by the license endpoint as valid with plan free;
Reproduction
docker build -t cloak-persistent-fp:local tools/cloak-docker-fp
docker run --rm --shm-size=2g \
-e CLOAK_LICENSE_KEY="$CLOAK_LICENSE_KEY" \
-e CLOAK_PROXY_URL="http://USER:PASS@HOST:PORT" \
-e CLOAK_FINGERPRINT_NOISE=false \
-e CLOAK_SEEDS="12345,27182,31415,42069,54321" \
-e CLOAK_PROFILE_ROOT=/profiles \
-e CLOAK_TEST_OUT=/output \
-v "$PWD/profiles:/profiles" \
-v "$PWD/output:/output" \
-v "$HOME/.local/share/fonts/windows:/root/.local/share/fonts/windows:ro" \
cloak-persistent-fp:localThe runner creates one persistent profile per seed and writes JSON results and screenshots to /output.
Results
| Seed | Tampering ML score | Tampering | Bot | Incognito | Proxy |
| 12345 | 0.9464 | true | not detected | false | false | | 31415 | 0.9983 | true | not detected | false | false | | 42069 | 0.9554 | true | not detected | false | false | | 54321 | 0.9960 | true | not detected | false | false |
The visitor ID remained stable when a persistent profile was restarted. The proxy exit IP rotated between runs, but FPJS did not classify it as a proxy.
Expected behavior
With a persistent context, a seeded fingerprint, and matching Windows fonts, the browser should not be classified as an anti-detect/tampered browser unless a known unavoidable signal is present.
Actual behavior
FPJS reports:
tampering: true
tampering_details.anti_detect_browser: true
tampering_ml_score: 0.9464-0.9983The result was reproduced with the explicit noise override enabled. Four seeds returned complete results and still reported tampering; one seed did not finish loading and needs a retry.
Questions
- Which CloakBrowser signal is expected to trigger FPJS
anti_detect_browserin this Docker/Xvfb configuration? - Is the result expected for the free-tier binary/license, or should the same fingerprint patches be present in the paid Pro build?
- Are there recommended Docker flags, GPU/ANGLE configuration, or font setup changes for a native Windows persona?
- Can Cloak expose a diagnostic mode that identifies which pa
Source: CloakHQ/CloakBrowser